What topics should candidates Biden and Trump focus on more in the debates?
12 ballots
Foreign Policy & War Leading
9 votes (75%)
Economy & Employment
8 votes (67%)
Government Reform & Anti-Corruption
8 votes (67%)
Healthcare
7 votes (58%)
Environment & Energy
6 votes (50%)
Abortion
6 votes (50%)
Infrastructure & Development
5 votes (42%)
Immigration
5 votes (42%)
Education
4 votes (33%)
Judicial System & Law Enforcement
4 votes (33%)
Technology
3 votes (25%)
Social Issues
3 votes (25%)
Crime & Drugs
1 vote (8%)
Approval Distribution
| Number of Candidates Approved | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|
All Candidates
(12 voters)
|
— | — | 16.7% | 16.7% | 25.0% | — | 16.7% | 8.3% | 16.7% |
|
Foreign Policy & War
(9 voters)
|
— | — | — | 22.2% | 33.3% | — | 11.1% | 11.1% | 22.2% |
|
Economy & Employment
(8 voters)
|
— | — | 12.5% | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | 12.5% | 12.5% | 25.0% |
|
Government Reform & Anti-Corruption
(8 voters)
|
— | — | — | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | 25.0% | 12.5% | 25.0% |
|
Healthcare
(7 voters)
|
— | — | — | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | 28.6% | 14.3% | 14.3% |
|
Environment & Energy
(6 voters)
|
— | — | 16.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 16.7% | 33.3% |
|
Abortion
(6 voters)
|
— | — | 16.7% | 33.3% | 33.3% | — | — | — | 16.7% |
|
Infrastructure & Development
(5 voters)
|
— | — | 40.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% |
|
Immigration
(5 voters)
|
— | — | — | 20.0% | 20.0% | — | 20.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% |
|
Education
(4 voters)
|
— | — | 25.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | — | 25.0% |
|
Judicial System & Law Enforcement
(4 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | 25.0% | — | 25.0% | — | 50.0% |
|
Technology
(3 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% |
|
Social Issues
(3 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | 66.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% |
|
Crime & Drugs
(1 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
Co-Approval Matrix
Percentage of voters who approved the row candidate also approved the column candidate
| Approved | Foreign Policy & War | Economy & Employment | Government Reform & Anti-Corruption | Healthcare | Environment & Energy | Abortion | Infrastructure & Development | Immigration | Education | Judicial System & Law Enforcement | Technology | Social Issues | Crime & Drugs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Policy & War | — | 77.8% | 77.8% | 66.7% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 22.2% | 44.4% | 22.2% | 44.4% | 22.2% | 33.3% | 11.1% |
| Economy & Employment | 87.5% | — | 75.0% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 37.5% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 12.5% |
| Government Reform & Anti-Corruption | 87.5% | 75.0% | — | 62.5% | 62.5% | 37.5% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 37.5% | 25.0% | 12.5% |
| Healthcare | 85.7% | 57.1% | 71.4% | — | 57.1% | 28.6% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 28.6% | 42.9% | 28.6% | 0.0% |
| Environment & Energy | 66.7% | 83.3% | 83.3% | 66.7% | — | 16.7% | 66.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 16.7% | 16.7% |
| Abortion | 83.3% | 66.7% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 16.7% | — | 16.7% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 16.7% |
| Infrastructure & Development | 40.0% | 60.0% | 60.0% | 60.0% | 80.0% | 20.0% | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Immigration | 80.0% | 40.0% | 80.0% | 80.0% | 60.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | — | 20.0% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 20.0% |
| Education | 50.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 75.0% | 75.0% | 25.0% | 75.0% | 25.0% | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Judicial System & Law Enforcement | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | — | 25.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Technology | 66.7% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 33.3% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Social Issues | 100.0% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | — | 33.3% |
| Crime & Drugs | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | — |
Anyone But Analysis
No "Anyone But" voting patterns detected (no ballots with exactly N-1 approvals)
When electing multiple candidates to a board or committee Proportional Approval Voting ensures that no single voting group dominates the outcome, promoting fair representation and reflecting the diverse preferences of all voters. In scenarios where there are more seats than choices available and where each choice represents a party—this method can allow a popular party to be allocated multiple seats proportionally, mirroring the party’s share of overall support.