CES Policy Poll: What enviromental issues do you hope politicians address in the next election?
4 ballots
Regulatory Reform and Reduction Leading
4 votes (100%)
Climate Change and Global Warming
3 votes (75%)
Sea Level Rise
2 votes (50%)
Deforestation
2 votes (50%)
Pollution Control
2 votes (50%)
Water Rights and Management
2 votes (50%)
Energy Independence
2 votes (50%)
Resource Development on Public Lands
2 votes (50%)
Environmental Justice
1 vote (25%)
Protecting Species
0 votes (0%)
Approval Distribution
| Number of Candidates Approved | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
All Candidates
(4 voters)
|
— | 25.0% | — | 25.0% | — | — | 50.0% |
|
Regulatory Reform and Reduction
(4 voters)
|
— | 25.0% | — | 25.0% | — | — | 50.0% |
|
Climate Change and Global Warming
(3 voters)
|
— | — | — | 33.3% | — | — | 66.7% |
|
Sea Level Rise
(2 voters)
|
— | — | — | 50.0% | — | — | 50.0% |
|
Deforestation
(2 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
|
Pollution Control
(2 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
|
Water Rights and Management
(2 voters)
|
— | — | — | 50.0% | — | — | 50.0% |
|
Energy Independence
(2 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
|
Resource Development on Public Lands
(2 voters)
|
— | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 50.0% |
|
Environmental Justice
(1 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
Co-Approval Matrix
Percentage of voters who approved the row candidate also approved the column candidate
| Approved | Regulatory Reform and Reduction | Climate Change and Global Warming | Sea Level Rise | Deforestation | Pollution Control | Water Rights and Management | Energy Independence | Resource Development on Public Lands | Environmental Justice | Protecting Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Reform and Reduction | — | 75.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| Climate Change and Global Warming | 100.0% | — | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| Sea Level Rise | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Deforestation | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | — | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Pollution Control | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | — | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Water Rights and Management | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | — | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Energy Independence | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Resource Development on Public Lands | 100.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | — | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Environmental Justice | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | 0.0% |
| Protecting Species | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Anyone But Analysis
No "Anyone But" voting patterns detected (no ballots with exactly N-1 approvals)
When electing multiple candidates to a board or committee Proportional Approval Voting ensures that no single voting group dominates the outcome, promoting fair representation and reflecting the diverse preferences of all voters. In scenarios where there are more seats than choices available and where each choice represents a party—this method can allow a popular party to be allocated multiple seats proportionally, mirroring the party’s share of overall support.