Please select one or more of the candidates that you approve of:
36 ballots
Bike Lane Barry Leading
30 votes (83%)
Public Transit Terry
27 votes (75%)
Libraries Laura
21 votes (58%)
Lower Taxes Tina
14 votes (39%)
Silver Spoon Sam
6 votes (17%)
Parking Ticket Pete
5 votes (14%)
Littering Larry
1 vote (3%)
Approval Distribution
| Number of Candidates Approved | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
All Candidates
(36 voters)
|
5.6% | 25.0% | 52.8% | 13.9% | — | — | 2.8% |
|
Bike Lane Barry
(30 voters)
|
3.3% | 16.7% | 60.0% | 16.7% | — | — | 3.3% |
|
Public Transit Terry
(27 voters)
|
— | 18.5% | 59.3% | 18.5% | — | — | 3.7% |
|
Libraries Laura
(21 voters)
|
— | 9.5% | 61.9% | 23.8% | — | — | 4.8% |
|
Lower Taxes Tina
(14 voters)
|
7.1% | 28.6% | 35.7% | 21.4% | — | — | 7.1% |
|
Silver Spoon Sam
(6 voters)
|
— | 33.3% | 16.7% | 33.3% | — | — | 16.7% |
|
Parking Ticket Pete
(5 voters)
|
— | — | 80.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% |
|
Littering Larry
(1 voters)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% |
Co-Approval Matrix
Percentage of voters who approved the row candidate also approved the column candidate
| Approved | Bike Lane Barry | Public Transit Terry | Libraries Laura | Lower Taxes Tina | Silver Spoon Sam | Parking Ticket Pete | Littering Larry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bike Lane Barry | — | 83.3% | 63.3% | 30.0% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 3.3% |
| Public Transit Terry | 92.6% | — | 70.4% | 25.9% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 3.7% |
| Libraries Laura | 90.5% | 90.5% | — | 28.6% | 14.3% | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Lower Taxes Tina | 64.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | — | 21.4% | 21.4% | 7.1% |
| Silver Spoon Sam | 66.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | — | 33.3% | 16.7% |
| Parking Ticket Pete | 80.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 40.0% | — | 20.0% |
| Littering Larry | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — |
Anyone But Analysis
No "Anyone But" voting patterns detected (no ballots with exactly N-1 approvals)
When electing multiple candidates to a board or committee Proportional Approval Voting ensures that no single voting group dominates the outcome, promoting fair representation and reflecting the diverse preferences of all voters. In scenarios where there are more seats than choices available and where each choice represents a party—this method can allow a popular party to be allocated multiple seats proportionally, mirroring the party’s share of overall support.